|
|
|
|
|||
|
and one is perhaps the best known
archaeological discovery of all time, its lengthy clearance
having held the world’s rapt attention for much of the
decade of the 1920s.
Chapter One retells the story of the accidental finding by
modern-day grave rob- bers of a cache-tomb in the cliffs just
south of the famous mortuary temples at Deir el Bahari, which
ultimately proved to house the rescued mummies of several of
the great kings and queens of the New Kingdom. Known popularly
as the Royal Mummies Cache, and formally as Deir el Bahari Tomb
320 (DB320 for short), this important site — unofficially
discovered in 1871 and officially and hastily cleared a decade
later — was itself, however, never formally
documented and published; it apparently has not been entered
since 1919 and today is totally inaccessible. The Egyptological
(and pub- lic) interest in DB320 has focused not on the site
but on its amazing human-remains contents. Appendix Two of the
present work presents the complete catalogue of the mummified
royalty (and others) of the Deir el Bahari cache.
Chapters Two and Three tell of two of the important early
discoveries made in the famous Valley of the Kings by French littérateur-turned-archaeologist
Victor Loret: the mostly robbed Tomb 35, that of Amenhotep II;
and the almost intact Tomb of Mai- herpri, Kings’ Valley
36. The first of these finds proved not only still to house the
re- wrapped mummy of its royal owner (along with smashed
fragments of his original grave furnishings) but also the
cached rescued mummies of several ad-ditional rulers of the New
Kingdom, along with the remains of some anonymous individuals.
Thus KV35 came to be known popularly as the Second Royal
Mummies Cache (or Cachette). Al- though ransacked and minimally
robbed in antiquity, the burial of the royal fan bearer
Maiherpri ranks as the first largely intact private burial
discovered in the Theban royal necropolis. Regrettably, Loret
never formally published either of his discoveries, one of
Egyptian archaeology’s greater losses. Ap-pendix Three is
a catalogue of the mummies, kingly and otherwise, recovered
from KV35.
Chapter Four and its several addenda recount the 1905 finding,
contents thereof and rushed clearance of, arguably, the second
most famous tomb ever discovered in Egypt, that of figures from
the sidelines of pharaonic history: Yuya and Thuyu, the
commoner in-laws of the great Eighteenth Dynasty pharaoh
Amenhotep III and grand- parents of the infamous Heretic,
Akhenaten. Like the Tomb of Maiherpri, that of Yuya and his
wife (Kings’ Valley 46) had been entered and minimally
robbed in the years not long after the couple’s
interment. Their impressive multiple gilded anthropoid coffins
of near-kingly quality (from a royal workshop, no doubt) were
the first such impressive funerary equipage to be discovered
fully intact; and their amazingly well-preserved and undamaged
mummies remain today the best and most attractive surviving
examples of the ancient embalmer’s craft. The discovery
of Tomb 46 brought to the forefront one of the truly
controversial figures in Egyptian archaeology, American
millionaire and dilet- tante digger Theodore M. Davis, who also
plays a central role in Chapter Six. While Davis did formally
(if inadequately) publish his 1905 find — and an entire
volume of the Egyptian Museum’s Catalogue
Général series was subsequently devoted to the
KV46 objects and mummies — it is regretted today that, in
the haste to empty the tomb (so that Davis could end his
ex-cavation season according to his personal schedule), no
photography was made of the contents in situ, thus leaving the
archaeological record sadly incomplete.
Only a
year later, in 1906, Italian excavator Ernesto Schiaparelli
made an almost equally amazing find, the never violated Tomb of
Kha and Merit (Theban Tomb 8) at Deir el Medina, the story of
which is the subject of Chapter Five. Kha, an architect liv-
ing during the reigns of Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV and
Amenhotep III, in all likeli- hood was the designer of the
tombs of the latter two rulers, and probably worked on the
sepulcher of the second Amenhotep as well. His wholly intact
interment (and that of his wife, who would seem to have
predeceased him) is the textbook example of what an
elite-status Egyptian of the mid-Eighteenth Dynasty regarded as
essential accompani- ments for the Afterlife. While
Schiaparelli had the good sense to at least minimally
photograph the TT8 burial chamber with its contents still in
place, he waited over twenty years to formally publish his
discovery, and the resulting over-sized volume in Italian —
while well-illustrated with many adequate photographs of the
tomb objects — is an often rambling account that falls
woefully short of being “scientific,” including no
measurements and not even giving the exact date of the
discovery. Theban Tomb 8 is also unique (in addition to its
fully intact state) for being the only major archaeological
discovery in Egypt that has almost no presence in that country
today (aside from the currently inaccessible tomb site itself),
inasmuch as Schiaparelli was permitted by Di- ector-General of
the Egyptian Museum Gaston Maspero, for reasons never
elucidated, to remove all but one of the tomb’s many
objects (a floor lamp) — and the couple’s coffins
and mummies — from Egypt to the Museo Egizio in
Turin, the Italian’s spon- soring institution.
Chapter Six is a recounting of one of the most debated and
written about in-terments ever discovered in Egypt,
Kings’ Valley Tomb 55, more popularly known as the
“Amarna Cache.” This sepulcher was found in January
1907 by Edward Ayrton, a young English archaeologist excavating
in the employment of the difficult Theodore M. Davis. The
anciently violated interment was not a “proper”
burial, but rather the make- shift caching of a royal
individual of the controversial Amarna period, whose identity
is problematic, and whose sex and age at death have been much
argued about as well. The ransacked and water-damaged condition
of KV55 when discovered would have made its clearance an
archaeological challenge in the best of circumstances; the
impatient Davis succeeded in creating the worst of
circumstances by wilfully permitting the un- cleared tomb to
become a sightseeing treat for his visiting friends, and
simultaneously requiring his relatively inexperienced
archaeologist, Ayrton, to work under the pressure of a hurried
schedule (once again, Davis required that the dismantlement be
finished by the fast-approaching end of his 1906-1907
excavation season). Although he permitted photography this
time, only seven views of the tomb’s in situ interior were
subsequent- tly published in his handsome-but-inadequate 1910
volume on the discovery. Interest- ingly, other accounts of the
KV55 event, frequently conflicting in details, were pub- ished
by participants in and onlookers at the opening and clearance
of the tomb, making it the Rashomon of Egyptological literature.
Fifteen years were to pass before another major discovery
occurred in the Val- ley of the Kings — the major discovery
of Egyptian archaeology, to be sure, and ar- guably the best
known archaeological find ever made anywhere. The Tomb of
Tut-ankhamen (KV62) is the subject of Chapter Seven and its
three addenda, and of Ap-pendix Four. Every schoolchild
probably knows at least the basic story of English arch-
aeologist Howard Carter and his aristocratic patron, Lord
Carnarvon, and of their tire-less search for and eventual
“final season” discovery of the treasure-filled,
gold-rich burial of the boy-king Tutankhamen — which,
though twice robbed in the years follow- ing his death, was
largely intact, the royal mummy being the only one ever found
rest- ing wholly undisturbed, just as it had been left by the
necropolis officials thirty-three centuries before. Retelling
the story here focuses on the archaeological aspects of the
event (the careful clearance of the tomb’s four chambers
over eight years, and a des- cription of the major ones of the
some 3,000 objects recovered therein) — the compli- cated
politics surrounding and impeding Carter, Carnarvon and their
discovery being dealt with separately in Addendum One. Although
Carter never got around to formally publishing KV62, his
three-volume “popular” story of the discovery and
its “treasures” certainly has been — and
continues to be — read by more persons worldwide
than any other archaeological account ever written.
In Tombs. Treasures. Mummies. I have attempted to present these “Seven
Great Discoveries of Egyptian Archaeology” as narratives
that can be enjoyed without any prior knowledge of the subjects
on the part of the reader. But each chapter is fully doc-
umented as well, for those who wish to brave the fine print for
the minutiae. The pho- tographs are, for the most part,
archival.
Dennis C. Forbes
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|